FROM STATE JURISDICTION TO THE MULTI-DOOR COURTHOUSE: A NEW PARADIGM IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Authors

  • TERCIO ADELINO DANTAS Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Pernambuco - TJPE

Abstract

This paper analyzes the Multi-Door Courthouse model as an alternative and complement to the traditional judicial system, in light of the growing demand for faster, more adequate, and more effective solutions to social conflicts. Starting from the historical evolution of jurisdiction and the consolidation of the state monopoly in dispute resolution, the study examines Frank Sander’s proposal and its reception in Brazilian law, particularly through the National Council of Justice Resolution No. 125/2010 and the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure. The research highlights the main consensual and adjudicative mechanisms, such as conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and criminal law instruments, emphasizing their role in fostering social pacification. It concludes by underscoring the importance of the Multi-Door Courthouse model as a tool for democratizing access to justice, enhancing party autonomy, and strengthening the
Rule of Law.

Author Biography

TERCIO ADELINO DANTAS, Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Pernambuco - TJPE

Graduado em Direito pela Universidade Estadual da Paraíba. Especialista em Direito Penal e Processual Penal pela Faculdade Arnaldo Janssen. Especialista em Direito Constitucional pela Faculdade Arnaldo Janssen. Analista Judiciário do Tribunal de Justiça de Pernambuco. E-mail: tercio.ad@gmail.com

Published

2025-09-16

How to Cite

DANTAS, T. A. (2025). FROM STATE JURISDICTION TO THE MULTI-DOOR COURTHOUSE: A NEW PARADIGM IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE. REVISTA JURÍDICA - DIREITO, JUSTIÇA, FRATERNIDADE & SOCIEDADE, 1(esp. 4), 101–116. Retrieved from https://www.revista.sentencadozero.com/index.php/rjsdz/article/view/338